Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Adventures of Rufus: The Fantastic Pet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 09:26, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Adventures of Rufus: The Fantastic Pet[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason Reviewed as a part of new article review/curation process. IMO fails wp:notability, both wp:GNGand the SNG. Small scale film does not even exist yet; director's previous one went straight to DVD/streaming. None of actors or director have articles. No indication of notability under the SNG. For GNG the only source is a medium length coverage article in The Oklahoman from the director's home state. I could not find any other sources or even reviews.North8000 (talk) 14:57, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. userdude 19:42, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not enough secondary coverage to merit an article, a draft would be a fair compromise IF someone plans on working on it. BOVINEBOY2008 19:07, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG due to a complete lack of sustained WP:SIGCOV in multiple independent reliable sources. The one local source is just not enough to get over any notability bar. Newshunter12 (talk) 03:47, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.