Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Adventures Of Saltboy And Pepperlad
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete as an admitted hoax. -- Kjkolb 01:43, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Appear to be unpublised superheroes, at least google knows not of them. Deprodded. Weregerbil 18:12, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and BJAODN. -- getcrunkjuicecontribs 18:13, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- oh, and delete also Saltboy, Pepperlad, Image:Saltboy1.JPG and Image:Pepperlad1.JPG. -- getcrunkjuicecontribs 18:15, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete egobation. --Kickstart70-T-C 18:17, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per nom and above. Just read the introduction of the article. Creator states that the information was invented by him/herself. Also, the creator states in the article's talk page that: "The beggining of their adventures will begin soon...." which, I believe, means these stories haven't even been made yet, and would violate the crystal ball policy. -Mtmelendez 19:18, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per Mtmelendez. - Motor (talk) 19:37, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete This is nonsense. Burninate it. Danny Lilithborne 19:52, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete this. Wikipedia is not for things made up in a school day. I suppose the pictures and redirects he made can't be deleted under AfD and must be taken to IfD and RfD? Hobbeslover talk/contribs 20:00, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Although BJAODN would be a fine too. Hobbeslover talk/contribs 20:01, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete: Interesting use of wikipedia, but, from the article, the only contributor has declared "this information is all mine," and that doesn't sort itself out well with the GFDL. - Christopher Lame 20:17, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.