Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Adventure Girls

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete as WP:CSD#G12 or WP:CSD#A7 - take your pick. - 2/0 (cont.) 22:59, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Adventure Girls

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not seem to meet notability guidelines. After discussion with author on the talk page, the author claims to have a website for the content in question, but I cannot find any other location at which this content is discussed. Mpdelbuono (talk) 20:32, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator note: The author has linked the website which he mentioned on the talk page in an effort to indicate that the article is not a hoax. ~~However, the page linked indicates that it is "under construction."~~ As this appears to be the only location at which this content is even mentioned, and there is no actual content on the page, I feel we cannot possibly maintain this article without violating no original research, and I feel that the lack of notability is asserted. --Mpdelbuono (talk) 20:39, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the page has been changed by the original author since posting this message, so the "under construction" message has been removed. I feel this indicates a WP:NOR violation. --Mpdelbuono (talk) 20:47, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There I just changed the website so you can't delete my page. What do you mean this indicates a violation? There's nothing that says I can't change my webiste.--ProjectShadow94 (talk) 20:50, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOR is the policy which states that articles must not contain original research. This means proper, independent, verifiable citations are necessary for content to be included. Because the website is controlled by you, any content cited by you from that site would still be original research. Additionally, the policy clearly states that primary sources must have been published by a reliable content stream. The details on what is and is not original research can be found within that policy. I feel that this article qualifies as original research and thus should be removed. --Mpdelbuono (talk) 20:57, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Made-up by author, WP:SELFPUB and not notable even if it wasn't. -- Scjessey (talk) 21:33, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete I can't find anything to link 'Kendra Yoder' with 'Adventure Girls' - except for http://theadventuregirlsseries.weebly.com/home.html . I have tagged the article for Speedy Deletion as it appears to be a copyright violation of this site. (I quote from the site "© www.TheAdventureGirlsSeries.weebly.com 2009.") The site in question is not a valid indicator of notability as it is self-published. Peridon (talk) 22:07, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have just replaced my SD tag and the AfD tag on the article after their removal by the article's creator. Please do not remove these tags from articles you have created. Peridon (talk) 22:41, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.