Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The 7PM Project Ratings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to The 7PM Project. JForget 21:40, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The 7PM Project Ratings[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not needed Mclarenaustralia (talk) 12:29, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 13:15, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 13:15, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Not needed" isn't a valid deletion reason - the correct question is not whether the article is "needed", but rather whether it is a notable topic. I see no reason why this shows ratings are notable within their own right, however they are notable to the show itself and as such I say merge to The 7PM Project. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:00, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Information that can easily be added for the most up-to-date time period on the main page. We don't need a page devoted to ratings of a nightly program. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 15:17, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Although the nomination reasoning is malformed, the lack of sources and obsessive detail about the ratings for a newsmagazine isn't needed. These kinds of articles are usually only of interest to a select few. Nate • (chatter) 23:16, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Quickly, this is an embarrassment, totally inappropriate. - Shiftchange (talk) 10:52, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, WP:NOT#INDISCRIMINATE. Ironholds (talk) 12:39, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.