Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The 66 Laws of the Illuminati

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 14:53, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

The 66 Laws of the Illuminati

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

The 66 Laws of the Illuminati (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An "official" document by the Illuminati? Not really, no, some unknown has self-published this, and it has received very little attention, so isn't notable. The only somewhat interesting source seems to be this, which gives us no information at all about the writer, publisher, ... but just some, I don't know, clickbait? No actual journalism going on here anyway. No reliable sources seem to have given this book any attention and I can't blame them. Fram (talk) 14:45, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Organizations. Fram (talk) 14:45, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
• Delete: No assertion or evidence of notability. UtherSRG (talk) 14:46, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Delete this almost appears to be a clickbait. There is no critical review of the book; simply having an ISBN means the book is published, nothing more. Oaktree b (talk) 15:22, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

no sources in Jstor or Gscholar. Oaktree b (talk) 15:23, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:BOOKCRIT, nothing at all in reliable sources. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 15:42, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and the awful use of english that requires WP:TNT. -Roxy the dog 16:32, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.