Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The 51 Worst Offenders In WWE History
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:40, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable one-off magazine that is fancruft and listcruft. Previously proposed for deletion but had template removed. Oakster (Talk) 16:41, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, do we really need a seperate article every time a magazine puts out a special edition? TJ Spyke 19:46, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Individual issues of magazines have to be extra-special to merit inclusion, regardless of genre. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 20:01, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as listcruft, the redirect The 51 worst offenders in wwe history needs deleting too. --- Lid 07:46, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Listcruft. RobJ1981 19:03, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. McPhail 21:38, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Del per nom. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 15:46, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 15:33, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a simple regurtitaion of the list, without value added or dicussion of the development of the ranking, is not up to the standards of Wikipedia.-- danntm T C 22:18, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.