Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The 4th Coming

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 15:10, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The 4th Coming

Was deleted through prod contested on DRV and undeleted. Article doesn't meet WP:V, WP:RS or WP:SOFTWARE Whispering 16:52, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I dont see any claim of notability, how is it different than any other MMPORPG or whatever it is that was copied after the big ones came too? Chris Kreider 17:20, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not sure exactly what this game's claim to fame is. Doesn't seem to meet WP:V/WP:RS. Wickethewok 17:55, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I still stand by my delete nom. Chris Kreider 20:21, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This page has been cited by indepedent sources and is notable.[1], [2], and [3]. Valoem ^talk 18:19, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - If so, I would like to see the sources cited in the article before I retract a delete nomination. Chris Kreider 18:52, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The game is notable. Some more independant sources are: [4], [5], [6], [7] Sean K 22:27, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, the game had almost 200,000 players back in 2001: [8]. It was publicised and distributed on CD in a major Australian gaming magazine (PC_Powerplay) when it was first released. I don't have a source for this - I just remember it happening. Sean K 23:11, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Ok mmoginfo.com is a listing for MMPORG's, the same for mmorpg.com, gamestationstore.com looks like a combination sale/review site. Pc.gamezone.com is a short blurb about the game no review or anything. Gameogre.com is another listing site, Au.pc.gamespy.com is another short blurb, and appdb.winehq.org is another listing site. Whispering 00:11, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - French website which reviewed the game: [9] French Wikipedia article (created 2 years ago): [10] News article on a French website: [11] I think this one's another review: [12] Looks like another review: [13] This is definately a notable game. Sean K 09:55, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete per nom. Anomo 10:10, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Percy Snoodle 07:30, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Ezeu 20:16, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. yandman 20:25, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. -- moe.RON ^{Let's talk | done} 03:41, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Looking at the sources, the only thing that's really been proven is that the game exists, which is not under dispute. As for notability, well, there is none. The Kinslayer 10:27, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. What Kinslayer said. (Hmmm...) —Wrathchild ^(talk) 16:41, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete None of those citations demonstrate notability. HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 19:07, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.