Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The 250 Most Important Albums of Latin Alternative

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr 13 19:24, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The 250 Most Important Albums of Latin Alternative

This article is about a list that once appeared in a music magazine. Although the musicians are notable, the list is not notable. Yechiel Man 14:07, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, inherently subjective, other people or sources may disagree. Furthermore, if this article is meant to represent a particular list at a particular time, then I don't see how much further the article could be developed. --Kyoko 15:55, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Also probably WP:COPYVIO. Clarityfiend 16:54, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and per Kyoko, and we still are waiting for the Wiki legal gurus to tell us when a top X list is or isn't a copyvio. Carlossuarez46 21:34, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. We had a big copyvio "debate" about the American Film Institute lists, which was finally settled by getting permission from them. Clarityfiend 01:19, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- per all of the above. Eddie 22:15, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No Delete, i really think this article must be kept it because of difficulty to get some info about lists or any kind media coverage about Latin Alternative genre. I know lists are subjective, but i think if it's developed the criteria what was used to be elaborated it it's possible to consider it as any list of Rolling Stone magazine that appears on Wikipedia. --JICAMARCA 21:16, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Maybe, it's better to change the title as Al Borde's The most important album of Latin Alternative. Please be fair with this article :/ --190.40.175.2 21:34, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The notability of Al Borde magazine has yet to be determined. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of info. Ohconfucius 03:42, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. It's notable for California's Latino community--190.40.175.2 21:34, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep. There are a number of lists regarding best songs or best films on [Wikipedia.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AFI%27s_100_Years..._100_Movies], [1], Of course any such list is subjective, but those lists (just as this one) makes it clear that the list represents the opinion of an identified source. The copyright issue would need to be sorted, and the top ten might have to be removed, but I see no consistency in deleting this article when a number of more or less identical lists abound. Would anyone of the contributors voting for deletion care to explain why this list is different from, say, The_500_Greatest_Albums_of_All_Time. JdeJ 18:21, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.