Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The 1920s Berlin Project

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 00:18, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The 1920s Berlin Project

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Written by a SPA back in 2009, and the whole thing reads like an advertisement/player's manual. Unless there's documentation of this somehow inspiring or influencing content in other video games, I really don't think a role-playing community is suitable for inclusion on Wikipedia. Loafiewa (talk) 20:52, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Loafiewa (talk) 20:52, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge the article is interesting and looking at the Second Life page, it doesn’t strike me as a completely unsuitable article for wikipedia. But it does seem to fail WP:GNG in that there are almost no citations, and there is no noted “significant coverage” that I have seen or found. It doesn’t sound like an advertisement to me and I think it would make sense to merge it. Tennis Anyone?^Talk 17:06, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The article is entirely unsourced, so there isn't much to merge here. IceWelder [✉] 10:30, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I searched {"The 1920s Berlin Project Second Life" -wikipedia} and did not find anything to meet WP:GNG nor do I see any claims in the article that suggest it would meet it. Jeepday (talk) 17:58, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I don't think a merge is necessary, especially since the article is entirely unsourced. I did a few searches and it yielded nothing valuable. RolledOut34 // (talk) // (cont) 03:57, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per WP:RS and WP:GNG. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 22:58, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.