Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TheWineKone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:34, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TheWineKone

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a YouTuber, not reliably sourced as passing WP:ENTERTAINER. As always, YouTubers are not automatically notable just because their YouTube content exists, but rather must clear WP:GNG on the sourcing before they're notable enough for Wikipedia articles -- but five of the nine footnotes here are his own or other people's YouTube videos, one is his "about me" profile on his own self-published blog, and one is a corporate press release, which means seven of the nine footnotes are not reliable or notability-supporting sources at all. And of the two references that are actually to real media, one just glancingly namechecks his existence a single time in the process of not being about him, and the other doesn't even do that, but simply verifies a stray fact about somebody else without even mentioning the subject of this article at all. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be referenced much, much better than this. Bearcat (talk) 15:17, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 15:17, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 15:17, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:30, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Bearcat. No significant independent coverage, doesn't meet WP:GNG. -M.Nelson (talk) 14:28, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable entertainer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:38, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.