Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thayne Center

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Salt Lake Community College. SarahStierch (talk) 02:03, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thayne Center[edit]

Thayne Center (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is about a non-profit specific to a community college that lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources to establish notability. The two references in the article consist of their own web site (not independent) and some sort of article from BYU on non-profits which is in accessible, but an article on the BYU website would not really advance notability. Whpq (talk) 11:44, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:37, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:37, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:38, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge and redirect to Salt Lake Community College. Doesn't appear to be sufficiently notable to merit its own article, but a paragraph or so of content condensed from this page would be a valid addition to the article about the college. --Arxiloxos (talk) 14:57, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge - It seems reasonable to make this a section in the SLCC article as it is sufficiently notable that something about it should be mentioned, but it doesn't deserve its own article. I did find one reliable source about this center, but that still fails WP:NOTE. --Robert Horning (talk) 14:15, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.