Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thalambadi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Canley (talk) 08:46, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thalambadi[edit]
- Thalambadi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unremarkable villageLAAFan 15:13, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep General precedent is to keep villages. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:18, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Pending Delete-No remarkable g-hits, horrible style and grammar. However, if a notable source is found, these issues could be fixed. Also, it needs to mention what country that it is in. ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ Drop me a lineReview Me! 15:18, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per general precedent on villages - assuming it can be proved that the village exists. I've also tidied the article to indicate its stated location better... CultureDrone (talk) 15:21, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep WP:NGL says that places/villages are notable, and it is similar to most other place stubs. Yamakiri TC § 08-25-2008 • 20:16:27 20:16, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep real villages are notable. Edward321 (talk) 23:29, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.