Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thailand–Uruguay relations
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:18, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thailand–Uruguay relations[edit]
- Thailand–Uruguay relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Looks like another random X-Y country relations article pairing, no evidence of notability. tempodivalse [☎] 03:07, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. -- Jmundo 03:21, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - they're on opposite sides of the world and don't have that much diplomatic clout, so it's no wonder sources are not forthcoming. Non-notable pairing. - Biruitorul Talk 03:31, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Uruguay-related deletion discussions. -- Russavia Dialogue 12:56, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia is not for miscellaneous information consisting of juxtapositions of countries noting whether they have diplomatic relations. Fails notability as well.Edison (talk) 15:34, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Once again, a randomly created article that does nothing to assert notability in world affairs, and is not likely to be able to. --BlueSquadronRaven 15:54, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no evidence of significant trade, cultural or diplomatic ties. another laughable random combinationLibStar (talk) 15:20, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- Russavia Dialogue 10:58, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.