Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thái Ngọc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SNOW closing this one. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:34, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thái Ngọc

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Person who is notable only due to a scientifically unverified rumor that he can survive without sleep. Deprodded in 2010 by a sock of Azviz (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki), but then PROD restored this week by Drmies (talk · contribs) on the argument that the deprod was bad faith; the original rationale was:

This is a rumour, and as far as I can tell there are no credible sources - this claim is based on interviews with Thai Ngoc by two minor Vietnamese media outlets, and has not been scientifically verified. Thai Ngoc is not notable for any other reason. Therefore, I propose that this article be deleted unless a sufficiently believable source can be cited.
— User:121.73.78.69

–LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 00:29, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Medicine, and Vietnam. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 00:29, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete obviously. Drmies prod restoration was perfectly fine and likely should have been left. 🙄 PRAXIDICAE🌈 00:48, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, for reasons I explained earlier. LaundryPizza03, this really was a waste of time. Drmies (talk) 02:06, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above Andre🚐 02:27, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Extraordinary claim needs decent sources, which this lacks. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 03:34, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I wasn't able to find anything to help support this claim. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 06:30, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I also wasn't able to find anything. Fad Ariff (talk) 11:40, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.