Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tfue

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Clear consensus by permitted !voters that there is notability shown Nosebagbear (talk) 19:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tfue

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable person with only few rs and all of them are unreliable. There are also no biographies and a slight content career --121.148.2.133

Procedural nomination on behalf of IP 121.148.2.133 Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 18:07, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 18:07, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 18:07, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 18:07, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 18:07, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 18:07, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This nomination is a bit odd. This is not a character but a person. There are references from Newsweek and The Hollywood reporter. Count me as at least a procedural keep unless someone can clear up this nomination.--Cube lurker (talk) 20:01, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Cube lurker, well that's what the IP commented https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tfue&oldid=925833474 --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 20:42, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I noticed you were copying over an IP's nomination. I was referring to the content of the nomination, and not any procedural work you did.--Cube lurker (talk) 21:02, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fine, already fix the typo. the topic has only few reliable sources and doesn't meet notability. 180.12.211.4 (talk) 22:35, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Restate my keep. We have Newsweek and the The Hollywood reporter. That's WP:GNG as I see it.--Cube lurker (talk) 14:40, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete As a Nominator, Poorly written with only few reliable sources. 180.12.211.4 (talk) 22:38, 12 November 2019 (UTC) blocked[reply]

I'm assuming this is the original nominator per [1] and per the comment posted on my talk page [2] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:06, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete I might not be a Hater, but this person isnt got reliable sources or anything besides playing fortnite. Same to the other streamer that got also nominated. BoneHeadHuman (talk) 12:52, 13 November 2019 (UTC) blocked sockpuppet[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 19:58, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment this nominating for deletion is Suspicious. An Ip has nominated and another Ip voted "Delete". Subject is notable as a Youtuber and has 5.7 million followers on Instagram. Abtehas98 (talk) 12:35, 14 November 2019 (UTC) ~~:An Ip already admitted that he is a nominator. Having many subscribers and followers doesn't make the topic notable, it depends on the coverage. BoneHeadHuman (talk) 13:12, 14 November 2019 (UTC)~~[reply]

Checkuser note: Every IP or new user in this discussion so far (and that is everyone who has !voted to delete) is either an open proxy, or a specific banned user, or both. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 15:31, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment is he notable enough outside of his issues with Faze Clan? I only see articles related to that and his Twitter ban, so this might fall under WP:BLP1E? If he's not notable outside of Faze Clan then redirect to Faze Clan of which he is a prominent member.AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:39, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I see plenty of coverage regarding Tfue.
- ESPN: Ninja, Tfue at risk of missing Fortnite World Cup duos final [3]
- ESPN: Fortnite World Cup Finals: Who to watch [4]
- Fox News: Fortnite star Tfue uses racial slur, but Twitch isn't commenting on rule violation [5],
- Newsweek: Tfue contract leak? Faze Clan streamer responds to organization [6]
- Verge: In the escalating fight between Twitch and Mixer, YouTube is the real winner [7]

According to the Verge article, he is Twitch's most followed active channel. Pbrks (talk) 21:37, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Verge and other sources prove the person passes the General Notability guidelines. The same IP nominated multiple things with the help of someone else, and the same two now blocked accounts went to all of them to say delete. Please see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TimTheTatman and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scump. Dream Focus 06:03, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Tfue seems to have gathered significant coverage from reliable sources. Some sources include:[8],[9],[10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24]. Therefore Tfue has satifisfied WP:GNG from this coverage. Spy-cicle💥 ^Talk? 14:16, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep widely in-depth coverage in reliable sources as a notable influencer. مضحرالعجایب (talk) 18:24, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Subject is a known influencer. NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 14:29, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.