Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teza Technologies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 10:07, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teza Technologies[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG, WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:GNG. Reads like an advertisement. scope_creep talk 17:24, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Jab843 (talk) 04:30, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 18:30, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notable per reliable sources. How is it written like an ad? - with references to criminal activity? That doesn't make sense. Strawberrie Fields (talk) 19:48, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

*Comment Strawberrie Fields is a completely new user, only commenting on this article. scope_creep talk 19:05 28 July 2014 (UTC) comment struck as patently false with incorrect date information, edit made 11 August 2014. See Strawberrie Fields 50+ edits. --Bejnar (talk) 05:40, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree it isn't written like an advertisement, but there are several other issues. The content largely relates to one person, who has his own Wikipedia page. There is nothing that suggests the company is notable, as it has some incidental coverage and thus fails WP:ORG and WP:CORPDEPTH. Mediphor (talk) 12:59, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Mediphor, the level of coverage is exactly what WP:CORPDEPTH indicates is insufficient. --Bejnar (talk) 17:53, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Mikhail Malyshev (the banker who set this up) seems highly notable, per sources, and most of the article is about him. Can we not rename the piece Mikhail Malyshev? He doesn't have his own page as yet - the existing Mikhail Malyshev is a footballer. AdventurousMe (talk) 05:51, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.