Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texas Exes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Goodvac (talk) 05:01, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Texas Exes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable section of alumni association. References are trivial and routine. TM 14:52, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. One of the largest and best-known alumni associations anywhere; the sources already provided in the article are adequate to demonstrate notability, and extensive coverage is easily found at GNews and GBooks. --Arxiloxos (talk) 17:09, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep seems to have enough sources to indicate notability.--Paul McDonald (talk) 17:44, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as article crosses the verifiability and notability thresholds with reliable on-topic third-party sources. - Dravecky (talk) 21:33, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the sources seem to be sufficient to establish notability. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 23:43, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Aequo (talk) 06:00, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:SNOW. Not many alumni associations are notable, but such a large, active group would be notable. Bearian (talk) 20:59, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.