Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texas Education Agency Gold Performance Acknowledgment Criteria
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:37, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Texas Education Agency Gold Performance Acknowledgment Criteria (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Should probably be merged into the article Texas Education Agency if possible. J (t) 12:49, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Original author here--would not object if it were merged. Quidam65 (talk) 21:36, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:21, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:36, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak merge and redirect; lean more toward delete. I call delete because it seems that it's kind of procedural, and we're not a procedural document repository per se. Merging would be appropriate, I suppose, if this was trimmed significantly. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 06:04, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 05:23, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Per WP:NOTEVERYTHING: WP is not a complete exposition of all possible details. Keristrasza (talk) 15:17, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, or highly condense and merge No indication of wp:notability. Plus Wikipedia is not the place for this type of information. North8000 (talk) 17:53, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.