Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texas Band of Yaqui Indians

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn‎. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 02:25, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Texas Band of Yaqui Indians[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails NORG. Cited mostly on primary sources but no independent, reliable sources is available. CSMention269 (talk) 05:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Texas. CSMention269 (talk) 05:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A quick search turned up this source which looks reliable and has some pretty detailed discussion of the Texas Yacqui band. Also some coverage here. Someone should check the hits for Yaqui at the Texas Observer. I don't have an opinion either way yet, but more is out there than what is on the article. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 08:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. They get written about fairly often. Will add more sources. Yuchitown (talk) 13:13, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Yuchitown[reply]
Keep. I'm not sure what the nominator means by "Cited mostly on primary sources", as it currently does not look like that to me. One user's sourcing has been removed, the user blocked for edit warring. Right now, the article and its sourcing looks pretty good to me. Most definitely notable to Texas history. — Maile (talk) 17:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Looks notable enough to me to be on Wikipedia. A quick scan of sources shows multiple secondary sources from different websites. ASmallMapleLeaf (talk) 17:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Upon a careful review of this, I withdraw my AfD request. Only thing we can do is to improve the article. CSMention269 (talk) 00:04, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! — Maile (talk) 00:07, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.