Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tetraphenyl group 14 derivatives

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 23:57, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tetraphenyl group 14 derivatives

Declined speedy. Rationale was, "this is not an article, this is an research proposal". SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:01, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Although that isn't a valid criterion for speedy deletion, this article is indeed more of a research proposal than anything. Notably absent in the text is any description of any experimental results involving these compounds. Zetawoof_(ζ) 05:29, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 06:57, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I completely agree with the nomination, it reads like a proposal rather a summary of what is KNOWN. Walkerma (talk) 15:27, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, although the final reference in this article (Laliberté, D.; Maris, T.; Wuest, J. D. "Molecular Tectonics. Use of Urethanes and Ureas Derived from Tetraphenylmethane and Tetraphenylsilane to Build Porous Chiral Hydrogen-Bonded Networks." Can. J. Chem. 2004, 82, 386.) has been published, a single source is not enough for an article. I've looked for another similar article to merge the useful introduction into, but I can't find anything related. Tim Vickers (talk) 17:23, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.