Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terry Martin (journalist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:23, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Terry Martin (journalist)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability. None of the sources are independent, with two being Martin's personal website, one being an interview with DW, which is non-independent as Martin is a journalist there, whereas there was previously a non-independent ref in the article that was removed by an IP (which was copied and pasted into this article, I've removed the copyvio and requested revdel), which is another profile about Martin being a speaker at a forum. Likewise, my WP:BEFORE found non-independent refs such as 1, 2 but there is insufficient non-trivial independent reliable sources to support WP:BASIC, WP:GNG, or WP:NBIO being passed. VickKiang (talk) 02:59, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. VickKiang (talk) 02:59, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:03, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Twinkle1990 (talk) 08:32, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The notability of a journalist is not established by his own self-published website about himself, or by a staff profile on the self-published website of his own employer — it requires third party verification of his significance in sources that don't sign his paycheque, such as notable journalism awards and/or analytical coverage about his work in other media outlets besides the one he works for. Bearcat (talk) 12:00, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to meet WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:03, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nom. I also tried to find any sources on the person at ProQuest and was unsuccessful. ☆ Bri (talk) 19:00, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.