Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terry Burns (medical inventor and picture framer)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 14:57, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Terry Burns (medical inventor and picture framer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't think this person meets the general notability criteria. The article itself is just a summary / rewording of what is contained in the single source - the newspaper obituary. Biker Biker (talk) 14:57, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As the author I'd like to defend this entry. google the Matburn Suction Pump and you'll see it's still widely used in medical procedures. And as the framer at the Royal College of Arts was responsible for restoring many notable works of art. {{User:Dansager]] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dansager (talk • contribs) 16:12, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Baseball Watcher 15:59, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable: If the pump was notable, it we would have an article on it. Your claim that he he notable because of this is insufficient.Curb Chain (talk) 17:38, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete He had some interesting life experiences, and it would not be surprising if he had some coverage in reliable sources, but all that is presented in an obituary, and it is just not enough to satisfy WP:BIO. Edison (talk) 21:00, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Edison. WP is not a memorial for interesting but non-notable dead people. Bearian (talk) 20:48, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.