Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Territorial Army Parade Ground

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 18:13, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Territorial Army Parade Ground[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Don't believe this meets WP:GNG. CricketArchives confirms that this stadium exists but thats it. No indication of Notability Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 10:09, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 10:09, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 10:09, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep hosted a first class cricket game (which is the WP:NCRIC guideline for players). But not surprisingly, online coverage of 1970s Indian cricket is poor. The-Pope (talk) 12:47, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There is general consensus is grounds which have hosted first class cricket matches are notable enough and deserves article. Ranji Trophy is primary and prestigious domestic tournament of India.--Human3015^TALK 18:21, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per usual practice regarding first-class cricket. AusLondonder (talk) 08:56, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per the Cricket Project's guideline for inclusion. The article had a failed-verification tag that (in effect) questioned whether the grounds ever did stage a first-class match. But whoever added the original reference had mis-typed the code number at the CricketArchive. It's been corrected and the tag has been removed. By the way, this same issue is being discussed in another AfD nomination, for Nehru Smarak Stadium. For some reason, this other nomination was not posted on the Cricket Project's Alert board. You might want to participate in that other discussion. NewYorkActuary (talk) 21:21, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: if this ground hosted a first class cricket match, which it does seem to have done, I would say that it is notable. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 23:13, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per NewYorkActuary, although the article is still short notability now seems to have been established. Anotherclown (talk) 23:38, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.