Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terri Sue Webb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:48, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Terri Sue Webb

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability, WP:BIO, WP:CRIME. She been arrested a number of times, but being nude in public is not notable and she doesn't seem to have a large following. Rusf10 (talk) 05:48, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related pages for similar reasons:

--Rusf10 (talk) 06:08, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment-The user who created most of these pages is User:Dandelion1 who identifies as Daniel Johnson, the real name of Jacob Gabriel above, therefore WP:AUTO and WP:Conflict of interest also apply--Rusf10 (talk) 06:20, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:52, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:53, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this whole interlinked set of unnotable articles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:15, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To get more opinions about this mass nomination.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:05, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for all of the articles listed above for it fails WP:BIO and WP:CRIME Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 08:21, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- HindWiki^Connect 00:46, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. To add to the above, this was created by SPA whose only edits are to service this article. Seems to be either vanity or fanpage, given all the OR. Agricola44 (talk) 17:16, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.