Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terrence Parker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Clear "Keep" consensus based on the principle of the article passing the WP:GNG (non-admin closure) AmericanAir88^(talk) 23:39, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Terrence Parker

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any evidence that the "top 20" claim of charting was anywhere meaningful and I can find almost nothing in the way of actual in depth, meaningful coverage or anything else that would otherwise meet WP:NMUSIC Praxidicae (talk) 23:46, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 01:39, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 01:39, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I am not sufficiently familiar with the sources to say whether they are reliable and independent, but a Google search for ("terrence parker" parker DJ) turns up > 200,000 hits. Some examples of coverage: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Cbl62 (talk) 14:41, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Have added refs and partial discography to the article. There seems to be plenty of additional coverage out there. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 02:50, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:GNG which requires significant coverage in reliable sources: HuffPost [6], Red Bull Music Academy (which has it's own online magazine) [7], Vice (magazine) [8], AllMusic [9], Clash (magazine) [10], Le Parisien [11]. There are also bits here and there at Mixmag [12], fr:Trax (magazine) [13] (and seems there is more in the print version judging by the article), and fr:Tsugi [14]. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:49, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the above comment made it clear that it meets GNG. Masum Reza^📞 17:21, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.