Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terra Trevor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Terra Trevor[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has come to my attention when User:Ppainter, who claims to be Trevor herself, wanted this page deleted for misinformation. An A7 speedy request was declined due to her "publishing multiple works in university press editions". I disagree; I think the article does not qualify for WP:GNG nor WP:AUTHOR. ~~ lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me • contribs) 20:26, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ~~ lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me • contribs) 20:26, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and California. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:29, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The article appears to have been vandalized/nearly blanked. Might as well simply delete it at this point. Oaktree b (talk) 02:09, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TNT. Due to the problematic edit history, even if this is a notable topic it would be better to completely start over. That said, I found zero significant coverage of Trevor in my university library search in terms of reviews of her work or works about her; although she does appear to be cited to some extent in the works of other academics. It’s not clear to me that she would pass WP:NAUTHOR, WP:NACADEMIC, or WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 08:13, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG. My university database search turned up some articles written by her, but none about her. My google BEFORE is showing websites with only self-provided information and standard author bios from non-independent entities. -Indy beetle (talk) 09:18, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no indication this subject meets notability per Indy bettle's review. Not every academic who has published something is notable. Even without odd edit history and the evident subject wanting this article gone, we have no good reason to keep it.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:50, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above and WP:SNOW. This is a private person, who has not done anything more than barely become close to notable for some scholarly work. Bearian (talk) 18:43, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.