Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terminus Group
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Sandstein 08:41, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Terminus Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG Patriot0239 (talk) 06:09, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Patriot0239 (talk) 06:09, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Has indepth coverage in Forbes[1], GulfNews[2], TechRadar[3], ForbesChina[4], Arabian Business[5] and many more. Prospsfs (talk) 06:20, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- None of these sources seem to meet the requirements of WP:NCORP: The Forbes source is a contributor article and is equivalent to a blog, which is not reliable (WP:FORBESCON). The TechRadar, GulfNews, and Arabian Business are trivial coverage as they discuss the companies participation in an event. The Forbes China source seems to be an interview which is a primary source. Jumpytoo Talk 21:07, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:22, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:22, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Couldn't find WP:SIGCOV of the actual company, only things that come even close are focused on its proposed "AI city" in China. Jumpytoo Talk 21:07, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Google search brings up much more sources. This article is poorly sourced. Here are some additional in-depth coverage: [6][7] [8] [9] [10] . Lesliechin1 (talk) 08:38, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Per above have enough coverage to satisfy NCORP and GNG. Grandruskiy48 (talk) 15:55, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Seems to have enough sources availble to pass notability bar. Zackdasnicker (talk) 04:54, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.