Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terminus Est

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was turned into a disambiguation page. There was consensus that the fictional topic should not have a stand-alone article. – sgeureka ^t•c 16:25, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Terminus Est

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fictional item (and not even from a super popular series like D&D or SW...). No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded with a request for AfD discussion, so here we go. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:58, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:58, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:16, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to The Book of the New Sun#Plot summary While I can find no indication that Terminus Est is notable, it is still mentioned in the potential target article. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 13:50, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; generic Latin phrase. I am opposed to a redirect for that reason, but a dab page wouldn't be unreasonable. Josh Milburn (talk) 17:46, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- I have boldly turned this into a disambiguation page to give a rough impression of what it would look like. If I'm reverted or consensus is against me, so be it! Josh Milburn (talk) 18:08, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, the total lack of actual encyclopedia entries on the disambiguation page, says that this is probably better off as a search term if people want to look for it, rather than a disambiguation._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 19:44, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — This is just a Latin phrase.--Jack Upland (talk) 04:46, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fictional. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails GNG/NFICTION.Kacper IV (talk) 12:00, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.