Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terminology standardization

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was: Speedily deleted - text dump, copyright violation. - Mike Rosoft 13:28, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Terminology standardization

Looks like a text dump from somewhere. The same or similar article has been deleted from ISO/TC 37 after WP:PROD (making this a contested proposed deletion). Delete. - Mike Rosoft 08:29, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Speedy Delete per Kevin_b_er Probable copyvio. It is a word-for-word dump of this ISO document. --DaveG12345 09:07, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Incidentally, the sister article Infoterm is similarly a word-for-word dump of the company's promotional PDF available for download here. Infoterm has been a candidate for deletion before, but I don't know how to find the log (am just going to have a look), nor do I know exact WP policy on unadulterated text dumps of promo material like this. So, FWIW, I'll leave it here for now. --DaveG12345 09:26, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Further comment OK, the AfD-tag "Advertisement, possibly a text dump from somewhere" was added to Infoterm by the nom of this current nom, Mike Rosoft, on May 27 2006 and was manually removed by a user the day after. So I guess this one's "contested" too. I'm not sure how to do these AfDs, so if anyone wants to help out, that would be great. It's a fact that Infoterm is a straight text dump (linkage to original above), with some minor recent edits (e.g. to remove the telltale "Mission Statement" header, etc.) --DaveG12345 09:57, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete both, copyvio. --Coredesat 11:54, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete Under speedy delete A8. No question as to just being a plain old text dump. Note that the history section is also copyvio. PDF version of the material Kevin_b_er 00:10, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.