Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terhi Holster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 14:47, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Terhi Holster[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am the article subject, and I regard myself as a non-notable, private person, and I want the article to be deleted. Toivohopehaap (talk) 08:54, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:26, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:26, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. @Toivohopehaap: Greetings. First of all we do not know if you are the subject as you claimed. Secondaly, even you are the subject, it is not up to the subject to state it their are notable or not but is determined by the Wikipedia notability guidelines. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:22, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- There is WP:BIODEL, but verification of the user as the subject is another another thing. --Pudeo (talk) 08:23, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The search links above do not return many results for the purposes of WP:GNG, although the article mentions achievements from the mid-1990s, which might only have been reported on in print. We don't have a specific guideline for ski-orienteerers, but there is Wikipedia:Notability (sports)#Orienteering. Cordless Larry (talk) 10:45, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE. I'll assume good faith on the identify of the requester. We shouldn't force someone to have an article about them when the person is not a public person or someone in an important position (such as politicians). Privacy matters and in many countries it matters more than in the US or UK. -kyykaarme (talk) 20:54, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete we need to respect people's pricacy unless they are well known and often covered, which this person clearly is not.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:18, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.