Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teracent

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 14:45, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teracent[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of the article lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails the notability guidlines for organizations. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 00:20, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It is acquired by Google. --Saqib Qayyum (talk) 14:32, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:35, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Another software company which specializes in display advertisements both for the web and for mobile phones advertising on Wikipedia. Spam for a spammer. Being bought out by Google only emphasizes that it was not in independent operation for very long, and does not suggest lasting signficance. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:54, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Snow delete: I'm trying hard to imagine an encyclopedic content in this article, which could be written if we had significant coverage in reliable third party sources for each and every step taken by this company... What can it be? Owners of the business? Advertisers? Sites, which deployed their advertisements? Acquisitions? The only thing that actually can make such company notable is the novel approach to advertising (which would, BTW, have its own article). But I don't see any proof that this is the case. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 23:54, February 15, 2012‎

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.