Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tera Online

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There seems to be broad agreement here that the topic does not meet notability guidelines. If there is consensus to merge at a later time, the content can be restored. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:24, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tera Online

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Product not released yet. No proof of notability. Not much in Google. No independent references. DanielRigal (talk) 16:05, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 16:08, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete until someone either makes a way better article, or good sources are found. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 14:14, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:31, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable secondary sources presented or coming from a search, WP:N has not been passed. No concrete details are available at this time and there is no basis for an article at this time; that may change in the future closer to its release. Someone another 00:00, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The release is 2010 and has been announced. I will edit the article to reflect more information but at the time of creation the information was hazy. Now there is more concrete information about this upcoming game and you can keep watch on this article to make sure I add more information.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Damianallison (talk • contribs)

Thanks for trying to improve things but without significant coverage in independent reliable sources it is not going to pass the notability criteria even if it is well written. What you can do, if it gets deleted, is request a copy be put in your user space. That way you can keep a copy and maybe bring it back as an article once the game is released if there is significant coverage then. --DanielRigal (talk) 16:36, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - Without current significant coverage (and we need something other than press releases (WP:N)), I would suggest a merge. Preferably this would be the game developer, but as they do not currently have an article, this should be Hangame. Marasmusine (talk) 12:30, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.