Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ten Towns

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of regions in Faerûn#Related places 7. So Why 07:18, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ten Towns

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This does not establish notability. TTN (talk) 21:09, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 21:10, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect: to Faerûn. No significant coverage. SL93 (talk) 00:42, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge to List of Forgotten Realms cities. BOZ (talk) 01:26, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as above, unless some good third-party sources can be identified. As we have the list, that seems to be the appropriate place for it. Josh Milburn (talk) 01:56, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to one of several possible targets. List of regions in Faerûn is one. --Lockley (talk) 21:07, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Faerûn. --Hirsutism (talk) 21:59, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Seems like a consensus for merging, but where should it go?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 01:26, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List_of_regions_in_Faerûn#Related_places_7. Looks like the most appropriate place for this to go, as it describes this topic in the most detail. Steven Crossin 01:56, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of regions in Faerûn#Related places 7 per User:Steven Crossin. Good call. bd2412 T 03:03, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete & redirect name only to List of regions in Faerûn#Related places 7. No notability established and the source listed is an in-universe publication: The Savage Frontier, "an accessory for the Dungeons & Dragons campaign setting Forgotten Realms". K.e.coffman (talk) 23:34, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per BOZ and WP:ATD-M. I'll note that K.e.coffman's opinion is not policy based, in that primary sources are perfectly acceptable to verify uncontroversial content; they just don't count towards notability. Jclemens (talk) 05:31, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:26, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.