Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ten Mile Point, New York
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Keep - as per modifications/improvements to article (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:40, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Ten Mile Point, New York (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Couldn't find anything about this scenic "area" (whatever that is); it's not even notable enough to be mentioned in the Skaneateles Lake article. Its "claim to fame" is that it has a camp there, but that doesn't have or deserve its own article either. ~EdGl ★ 22:52, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails to indicate notability, either for the scenic area or the camp. The scenic area doesn't even appear to be a recognized name outside of information relating to the camp. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 21:49, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep it is a geographical place with significant coverage in secondary sources. The article has been improved since it was nominated. It now has a U.S.G.S. link, a map, old photo, and some references. --Bejnar (talk) 19:25, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Great job with the article! I happily withdraw the nomination. ~EdGl ★ 19:36, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: well rescued by Bejnar!--Milowent (talk) 17:55, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep all geographic locations are accepted as notable. Dew Kane (talk) 04:12, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.