Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ten Commandments of Computer Ethics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep new version, which I have now put in the article. Wizardman 16:39, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ten Commandments of Computer Ethics[edit]

Not content for an encyclopedia Plushpower (talk) 20:15, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete--copyvio. Justin Eiler (talk) 20:16, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 20:19, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lots of soap suds for cleanliness, with a bit of copyvio thrown in for the complexion. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 20:23, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, although we could probably have an article on the Computer Ethics Institute itself, and discuss the Ten Commandments development process there. --Dhartung | Talk 21:59, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Denaar (talk) 02:02, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete? This is a copyright violation, is it not? RFerreira (talk) 19:14, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Let's quickly fix the copyvio and keep the article (I can do this). This subject is widely referenced in ethics of computing ~~articles~~ books. It is also used by professional organizations such as the CISSP. Book references: [1],

[2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Noah Salzman (talk • contribs) 01:59, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I have created an alternative stub article here. Haven't had a chance to incorporate the book references yet, but it may be a workable replacement to deal with the copyvio issues. —Noah 02:13, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've done a little more work and I think the stub is quite viable at this point. Please consider replacing the current article with my version rather than deleting it outright. Thank you. —Noah 07:41, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and replace as per Noah. Eithin (talk) 13:33, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.