Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ten Cents (TUGS)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to TUGS. Since no article currently exists for merging, I've redirected the article to TUGS until such an article is created, and the content merged. seresin ( ¡? ) 22:36, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Ten Cents (TUGS) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I am nominating this article plus the 26 others in Category:TUGS characters. Captain Zero (TUGS), Izzy Gomez (TUGS), were already deleted and the episode lists have also been merged following this discussion. These elements of the TUGS series do not establish independent notability. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, these are just made up of unnecessary plot summary, original research, and extremely trivial statistics and model and toy details. Also the main TUGS article needs severe cleanup. There is already a TUGS wiki where this information has been transwikid. Formdog (talk) 23:43, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to a list of the TUGS characters, either in the main article or separately, giving some information about who they are. It does not make sense to use a decision to merge episode articles as precedent to delete, not merge, character articles. I hope when the articles here are merged, they will be merged more carefully than the present state of the episode articles, which still provide excessive detail. There's a median, though we rarely seem to see it here. DGG (talk) 23:54, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge agree with DGG. --Michael Johnson (talk) 00:14, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per D double G, the problem with these articles is that because the show was made so long ago, there are NO real reliable websites which source information on it. Is there anything that can be done about this in terms of this deletion debate, or even all the TUGS characters in general? --SteelersFanUK06 ReplyOnMine! 11:31, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge all into a character list per lack of individual notability. I think even a bold merger would have been non-controversial, so this AfD isn't strictly necessary (unless you really wanted to have them deleted in the first place). – sgeureka t•c 12:50, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.