Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tellarite

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Star Trek races. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 04:34, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tellarite[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another Star Trek article that totally fails at Wikipedia:Notability (fiction). Fear not, this is already covered much better at MemoryAlpha. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 23:29, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Star Trek races Having worked up the related Enterprise articles that they appeared in to GA, I can say that there isn't much there to expand the article. They're the least known of the significant Star Trek races, probably because they were based on some converted pig masks for TOS. There just isn't going to be much to talk about here, so it might as well be redirected until further sources appear further down the line. You never know, one might turn up prominently in Discovery or something and cause more coverage of the race. Miyagawa (talk) 18:28, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:47, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:47, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:47, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Star Trek races per Miyagawa's comments. Again, whether or not the subject is covered in MemoryAlpha is irrelevant to this discussion. Aoba47 (talk) 15:34, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - per the arguments above. I don't see a lot of coverage in independent RS, and they appear to have only a small role/place in the star trek universe itself. Fyddlestix (talk) 15:09, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Sensible option. Not worth a separate article right now. Perhaps in the future. Lourdes 03:12, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.