Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Telephone (artwork)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:24, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Telephone (artwork)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The three sources (which seem to use the same text anyway) only briefly mention the telephone as part of one exhibition, no indication that it is actually a notable work of art. Fram (talk) 14:18, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts and United Kingdom. Fram (talk) 14:18, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find anything about this particular artwork, many articles about telephones in art. Doesn't appear to have been a notable piece past the initial display a decade ago. Oaktree b (talk) 14:44, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. After the lead the text is gallerist gobblededook. Johnbod (talk) 14:46, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It would be too big of a stretch to say the artwork is notable, perhaps consider listing it under the artist's article?Avignonesi (talk) 16:44, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No WP:SIGCOV, does not meet WP:GNG. Netherzone (talk) 21:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Delete as per the nominator.Pragnain (talk) 03:51, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.