Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Telangana Sheep Distribution scheme

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Merging can always be discussed on talk page. So Why 11:29, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Telangana Sheep Distribution scheme

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has very little WP:GNG on it's own and seems to be written more a promotional article then an informative one. At best, a couple of lines can be merged into Kalvakuntla Chandrashekhar Rao under the CM section (a line is already present) Adamgerber80 (talk) 00:33, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere _talk 00:59, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- Since when is GNG a mass noun that an article can have much or little of it? It's a binary standard. An article either meets the GNG or it does not. This one does. The two sources from The Hindu prove that. This is one of the major national newspapers of India, roughly equivalent to the NYT in the US. The fact that it's covered by Telangana Today just drives the GNG up to eleven! 192.160.216.52 (talk) 13:09, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 15:54, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 15:54, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 15:54, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Szzuk (talk) 12:50, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 04:57, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.