Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teen Top
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -- DQ (t) (e) 16:37, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Teen Top (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod - Non-notable, non-sourced band that fails WP:BAND. Aspects (talk) 22:03, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Aspects (talk) 22:04, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:45, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply] - Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - the group is relevant in Korea as they have charted on Korea's national chart (proof here) and have been nominated for a major award (the Mnet Asian Music Awards, equivalent to about the MTV Awards for Korea) as Best New Male Artist (proof here). They've also been the subject of a TV show but I can't find any reliable sources for that. 21nolja 00:35, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Teen Top was awarded the Rookie of the Month award in August of last year by the Ministry of Culture and Korea Contents Association. Unfortunately, the source is in Korean, so I apologize. They were also part of the Top 20 Trending topics on Twitter at one point, and part of an article that recognized them as the next "hot topic." The original article is here with an approximate translation here. Suicidethrone (talk) 11:01, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.