Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted lang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:52, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ted lang[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable autobiography (or at least a strong conflict of interest VernoWhitney (talk) 17:41, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not only a blatant and promotional COI/auto BLP, but I'm also not finding any independent reliable sources that demonstrate notability. Fails WP:BIO. PDCook (talk) 20:49, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - does not meet crit. of WP:BIO. Tzu Zha Men (talk) 21:02, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, basically a biography of a non-notable person written by his friend or relative. However, those of you who didn't find anything weren't looking too hard. He's quoted in an LA Times article about the writers' guild strike here, and there's another Times article quoting and discussing him and his wife on some horse-related issue here. I don't consider these to amount to significant coverage of the man himself, but if someone can find substantially more I'll consider changing my !vote. Glenfarclas (talk) 00:14, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I came across one of those articles myself, but I agree that they aren't significant coverage and don't demonstrate notability. PDCook (talk) 01:47, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.