Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Mineo
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 19:36, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Ted Mineo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No indication of notability under which the subject would pass Wikipedia:Notability (people). siℓℓy rabbit (talk) 00:32, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails notability for artists. --Macrowiz (talk) 00:59, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. per WP:CREATIVE: "The person's work either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums, or had works in many significant libraries." I would claim that the NYTimes is significant critical attention. There are also many relevant ghits. Billscottbob (talk) 02:00, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:15, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:15, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - coverage by the NYTimes here sounds significant enough.--Boffob (talk) 14:31, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.