Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technology resourcing
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 15:45, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Technology resourcing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable, no assertion of notability. Back-office ouitfit. No references. No third party sources and article has been around since 2006 Velella Velella Talk 11:51, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:20, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete very spammy...they're all over the web, but seem to completely lack significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. I'm happy to reconsider if someone can find such coverage. (This is at least a good try, but I'm not sure if freelancesupermarket.com meets WP:RS & I don't think its coverage is of sufficient depth to meet notability guidelines.) — Scientizzle 15:45, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wikipedia is not a free web host for advertisements: ....recruitment specialists, sourcing technology and engineering professionals for Permanent Staff appointments and for Contract, Consultancy and Interim Managment assignments for a diverse range of clients.... You are using capital letters improperly as well. Pande manum. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 21:03, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete possibly even a g11 as entirely promotional. DGG ( talk ) 04:54, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.