Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Techlogica

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete - brenneman ^{T}^{L} 23:16, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Techlogica[edit]

Fails WP:SOFTWARE and WP:CORP: Nn download stats, no media coverage. I tried three times to ask the article creator/company founder to assert its {{notability}} and he concludes I'm a competitor. I hereby ask the community to decide.-- Perfecto 00:19, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable and reeks of advertising. Given that the main editor of this page is Techlogica... vanity much? --Kinu 00:22, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Royboycrashfan 00:23, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete blatant advertising, not WP:CORP Camillus (talk) 01:15, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Clear case of advertising. Mikkerpikker ... 01:25, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per aboveWhere (talk) 02:01, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above. --Aaron 02:57, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. TheRingess 06:34, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this hideous SpamVert ++Deiz 12:45, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Prodego ^talk 14:11, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Vanity and advertising - • | ĐÜ§§§Ť | • ^{T | C} 21:45, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It reads like an ad+vanity.--Shella 00:19, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as ads.Blnguyen 05:06, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per nomination, fails all tests, advertisement. --Wingsandsword 08:51, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ad, vanity, non-notable and dishonest (deleted the page's AFD tag). KarlBunker 16:50, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete spam Tawker 00:07, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Shella, TestPilot 00:09, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You people use the words "spam", "dishonest" and "hideous" to describe the company page for Techlogica? Its almost as if you don't even know the meaning of these words. Spam? No, spam comes in your email, our page isnt being forced on anyone. Dishonest? No, I reverted my page after what in my opinion was vandalism. Attempting to delete an article for no reason, now that I would consider dishonest. Very strange how you (Perfecto in particular) seem to be on some kind of crusade to get our page deleted for no reason other than the fact that you don't like it. Our page isn't any different than the other company pages listed here. It was simply a resource for someone interested in our company to see some general information. This whole thing has been very silly, asinine in fact, and very juvenile. I'll never understand how people get off on making things hard for other people.

Strong delete, especially in light of the above statement. Juvenile actions like this won't save your page, regardless of whether the nominator has a bias or not. Your company is simply not notable under the guidelines set in WP:CORP, and if you don't care for that, then get yourself an account and work to change the guidelines there. Coming here and expecting what is essentially free advertising is both disingenious and contrary to good company ethics and thus shows a company clearly needing a gimmick to survive...just like so many other fly-by-night companies that have come trying to get "free Wiki ads".--み使い Mitsukai 01:06, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There are many free web-hosting places out there that would be glad to be a resource for someone interested in our company to see some general information. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia; however, and is not the place for such things. Peyna 03:59, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Mitsukai and Peyna, and of course WP:CORP. Bad ideas 23:29, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - cant see a reason for notability. --Pierremenard 08:24, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.