Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teamemo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:36, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Teamemo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It is too soon to consider creating an article on this subject; I cannot find the required significant coverage of this subject in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject, as required by Wikipedia's general notability guidelines. Biogeographist (talk) 12:46, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Biogeographist (talk) 12:46, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A WP:SPA article describing a piece of software launched at the end of last year. No claim to notability, and no independent coverage provided or found in my searches. AllyD (talk) 10:11, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 17:05, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.