Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Team Cherry (developer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Hollow Knight. Userfy done on request, however the article should not be moved back to mainspace unless notability increases. (non-admin closure) b uidhe 19:32, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Team Cherry (developer)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Business does not yet meet WP:GNG for an article. A Google search returns only primary sources, or passing mentions in articles about the video games developed. While the games themselves are notable, the developer does not have any reliable secondary sources to substantiate having a Wikipedia article at this time.

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:16, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:17, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The developer is notable mainly in relation to their game Hollow Knight. There is probably not enough coverage to warrant a separate article aside from the game's article. — bieχχ (talk) 23:05, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Response while I agree that baseline notability is in alignment with the game Hollow Knight, team cherry has a unique art style and game development processes. There are countless videos and tutorials on how to make art similar to the works of team cherry, as well as coverage on there style of game dev. this could be viewed as material for Hollow Knight, however they embody this in all of there games, namely silksong, and will continue to in the foreseeable future. they also have a few awards related to the studio, witch I will update in the wiki page. I do hope my response is considered, and that I have not been too much trouble. if it comes to deletion, i would prefer to have it moved to userspace, so that it is ready should they achieve notability, however of course, I wish it to remain on wikipedia for the public eye.
Redirect to Hollow Knight. As stated by the nom, there really is not much out there in reliable sources that talk about the team, making this a case of being a bit WP:TOOSOON. I think a redirect to Hollow Knight, their only released game at the moment, would be useful, though. And when/if they start garnering more coverage that could support an article, it can be spun back out then. Rorshacma (talk) 01:34, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable except in relation to Hollow Knight. Possibly WP:TOOSOON, but either way this should not be an article yet per WP:NCORP._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 10:43, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Hollow Knight. A likely search term but there is very very little to be found about the subject other than in direct relation to Hollow Knight. Most of the current article is already covered in Hollow Knight. Perhaps merge up the employees responsible and any other missing bits into #Development, and that will then include everything? Aoziwe (talk) 11:22, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"Request" If this is chosen to be deleted... witch I hope it wont, could you move it to userspace? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scaledish (talk • contribs) 01:22, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.