Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Team Bella

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to The Bella Twins. – czar 20:28, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Team Bella

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor storyline that doesn't meet WP:GNG. Does not have significant coverage in reliable independent sources. Any sources would be WP:ROUTINE match results. Maybe redirect to The Bella Twins. Nikki♥311 04:04, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Nikki♥311 04:05, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - non-notable group, content should be sent to The Bella Twins / Alicia Fox. starship.paint ~ KO 06:36, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/Redirect to The Bella Twins - not notable.LM2000 (talk) 07:06, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete & Redirect to The Bella Twins per above - Non notable to warrant seperate article but seems to better to redirect. –Davey2010^Talk 22:03, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Team bad per nomination, and WP:CRYSTALBALL. If B.A.D. continues as a stable after the bellas fued, they may earn an article --w^L^{<speak·check>} 07:39, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi WikiLeon, I've readded your !vote but have removed "TheBellaTwins1445: is also nominating the following related pages:" above- Since everyone's !voted on one article I think it's best that the other article is basically a completely new AFD otherwise this AFD isn't going to make sense to anyone , Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 14:40, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Keep, the deletion reason is mis-leading, this is not a 'minor' storyline, it's the biggest thing the Diva's division had done in a long time. Ranze (talk) 01:17, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]