Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tea-upon-ice
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Singularity 19:54, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Tea-upon-ice[edit]
Delete as WP:MADEUP - previously PROD - initial contrib removed PROD Mayalld (talk) 12:05, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It's probably made up and you'll never get reliable sources on the article anyway - the entire article is based on a blog. Littleteddy (talk) 12:16, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete, though I wouldn't put the US Patent Office past granting him a patent on it. Chris Cunningham (talk) 12:22, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Please do not abuse the Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion. Uncle G (talk) 13:02, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Where something is WP:MADEUP, and relies on a self-published web source, it is A7 as NN-web, however I detect a determined hoaxer here, so AfD it will be Mayalld (talk) 14:04, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- No. When something is made up like this, as that very page tells you, it is original research that goes through the normal deletion process. CSD #A7 applies, as it says, to people, companies, groups, organizations, and web content. This subject is none of those things. It's purportedly a type of beverage. It's not a web site, an Internet meme, a podcast or any of the other web content to which WP:WEB applies. Uncle G (talk) 16:53, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Where something is WP:MADEUP, and relies on a self-published web source, it is A7 as NN-web, however I detect a determined hoaxer here, so AfD it will be Mayalld (talk) 14:04, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Please do not abuse the Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion. Uncle G (talk) 13:02, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. nn fails WP:RS. Blog reference fails WP:NOR. Sting_au Talk 12:37, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:MADEUP Doc Strange (talk) 13:46, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Based on the last sentence the article is a joke or hoax.GtstrickyTalk or C 14:01, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and Redirect to Iced tea --Storkk (talk) 14:30, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. As (one of) the original prodder(s). Clearly someone having fun.--Kateshortforbob 17:44, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and sugar Fg2 (talk) 06:28, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This is a joke article about a series of joke blog posts. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 11:05, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.