Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Te Daré Lo Mejor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Te Daré Lo Mejor[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Original nomination by IP: Fails notability criteria for albums. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 00:47, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. (see below) FYI the title translated is "I'll Give You The Best". Raymie Humbert (t • c) 01:13, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep - This is a failed nom as it meets the very criteria cited: WP:NSONGS. The second paragraph reads:

"In general, if the musician or ensemble that recorded an album is considered notable, then officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia."

The album is the fifth release from Jesus Adrian Romero, who has an article and is notable on Wikipedia, and is one of six albums released. The presumption on Wikipedia via this paragraph is that if an artist is notable, his works are usually inherently notable once released. The album is available from Amazon.com at this URL. I am not sure what the rush is to delete this new article, but WP:BEFORE should be definitely considered. ----moreno oso (talk) 01:30, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is no rush. It was prodded first, which would have allowed for a week in which improvements could have been made. The prod was removed without any improvement to the article, so we find ourselves here instead. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 01:48, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Yes, there was a rush and the CSD and PROD were pushed by this anon IP all the same day as the article was created. I declined the PROD with an edit summary that indicated the artist was notable and this was the fifth album. ----moreno oso (talk) 02:03, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Morenooso. --Slon02 (talk) 01:54, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Key word in the sentence quoted by moreno oso is may. There is no evidence that is does meet the notability criteria. Simply being for sale does not show notability. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 01:58, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) BTW, 69.181.249.92, you may not know it but your nom is your iVote. ----moreno oso (talk) 02:03, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Morenooso (switched vote). Note that the above is from the nominating IP Raymie Humbert (t • c) 02:00, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I ran the Google news results through Google translator [1] and there is coverage for this album, they talking about it. Read the summaries there. Dream Focus 10:57, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The article under discussion here has been flagged for {{Rescue}} by the Article Rescue Squadron, with no explanation as to why this article should be rescued and how that could happen (per ARS instructions). SnottyWong ^talk 18:57, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep per WP:NALBUM, although the current sources are not very convincingly establishing notability. Article is still very promotional. SnottyWong ^talk 18:57, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep appears to meet WP:NALBUM but might be better to merge (to the artist page?)... Willing to give this article time. Shooterwalker (talk) 06:21, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.