Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taylor Gildersleeve

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. - Mailer Diablo 15:48, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Gildersleeve

Non-notable ingenue actress, barely two weeks into her first role. Article was prodded and deleted previously. Recreated, so discussing deletion here. —C.Fred (talk) 00:06, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very odd weak delete a Googling confirms the actress and character name on several websites, but she doesn't seem to be in the IMDB just yet. I'd say delete for now. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:16, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Week keep. I found an ABC publicity picture and listed it as an external link. I think her current role makes her more-or-less notable. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 00:26, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Serviceable stub of recurring character on makor television show. JChap2007 00:34, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Still not a notable actress. No imdb article as well [1] --Ageo020 01:01, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, has a role in a major television show, soap or not: per WP:BIO, "notable actors and television personalities who have appeared in well-known films or television productions" pass. Crystallina 01:07, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: "notable actors and.." So first they have to be "notable" and then have been in a well-known production. Doesn't make sense in trying to establish notibility. But I agree, if she has been on well-known films and television productions that makes her somewhat notable. --HResearcher 05:56, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, all other current contract cast members have wikipedia pages, including relatively newer actors like Ambyr Childers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Homeofneighbours (talk • contribs)
Weak keep per TruthbringerToronto, JChap2007, and Crystallina even as the citation provided doesn't quite make sense. --HResearcher 05:56, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. rookie American actress on an afternoon soap with no track record. No hits on abc.com. Ohconfucius 07:10, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Bucketsofg✐ 16:34, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Current role, major network TV series. Have we started deleted articles on newly notable subjects just because IMDB doesn't update as fast as Wikipedia? VivianDarkbloom
Delete per nom-Doc 22:28, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stilgar135 05:00, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for failing WP:BIO; for not having multiple non-trivial-articles by third parties; she's won no awards, shows no indication of any fan base, nor made any enduring contribution to the historical record of her field. I see no claim that her role is either major or important on the show, either. She's working in a well-known production; lucky her. No indication that she's notable herself yet; at best, this sort of claim to notability by association only belies her own notability. Merge into "All My Children" article, at best. Tychocat 14:31, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.